CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
News hero gradient

Nasdaq 100: Is Tech Set to Tumble?

By :   James Stanley , Sr. Strategist

The leader has become the laggard. Despite fresh ATHs in both SPX and the Russell 2000 in 2026, the Nasdaq remains below the high set at the Fed’s October meeting. But – is that a sign of what’s to come or a simple scenario out of overbought stocks?

Starting this week a bearish blog post that circulated on social media over the weekend was widely credited with causing a sell-off in stocks. Even the Wall Street Journal penned an article attributing the move to the reality of what that blog post had pointed out, which was really just shining a light on the elephant in the room.

But two days later and the S&P 500 has jumped above last week’s levels and while the fear has dissipated from the headlines, at least a little bit, the awkward sense of unease remains in-place. The rally that started from the 2022 lows remains long-in-the-tooth for a number of issues, including a big one that’s reporting earnings in a few hours with NVDIA. And the dynamic shift over the past four months is undeniable as the Nasdaq 100 which was very much the leader both out of the 2022 lows and last year’s ‘Liberation Day’ lows has lagged behind both the S&P 500 and even the Russell 2000 index.

Both a positive and negative argument can be mustered by such a fact. On the positive side, stretched valuations got ahead of themselves in the premium AI names and we’ve simply seen a rotation of capital into lower valuations, boosted by the prospect of economic growth from both monetary and fiscal stimulus that could potentially help those lower valuation and small cap companies a bit more than their large cap tech brethren.

But, in the negative camp, this capital allocation can be argued as a late stage move with the larger push points for the rally now seemingly holding unattractively high valuations. And in that scenario it could just be a matter of time before more funds and traders are compelled to take profits off the table in anticipation of a rocky road ahead.

Earnings can have a sway on the matter, to be sure, but the fact of the matter is that positioning and sentiment are more dominant push points for price than pure fundamentals, as it takes supply and demand to dictate price movements.

If practically anyone willing and wanting to be long already is, well, even the brightest news report in the world can fail to muster adequate demand. And the very nature of a market not moving up when it probably otherwise would have can create enough concern to cause at least some longs to cut bait, which leads to supply and lower prices.

It’s rare that this happens like a light switch getting turned off because pullbacks and support tests will often bring out latent bullish behavior, leading to demand and a bounce which can bring on higher prices. But as we reapproach prior highs – and as bulls get more and more skittish of testing resistance or holding for another breakout, we can begin to see lower-highs post and that can be an early warning sign that a deeper retracement might be near.

In the Nasdaq 100, we’ve had that stalling near the highs after the high that was set at the October 29th Fed rate decision. Since then – the index has been in a significant grind with buyers unable to continue the rally that ran for more than 60% from trough to peak last year.

Nasdaq 100 Futures – Daily Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

Delay Doesn’t Mean Doom

It’s easy to look at the life cycle of that trend last year and then ascribe a negative outcome. After all, the initial rise is clear as is the slowing of that rally; and, logically, the next step would be a sell-off or retracement. That negative scenario can be strengthened with deduction given that we’ve had both a dovish Fed and a strong push from fiscal policy and neither have really been able to help the long side of the tech-heavy index.

But, the reality is each pullback has so far been bid fairly well, with the October pullback finding support at a confluent area of Fibonacci levels and then the January/February pullback seeing buyers come in to hold the lows above that price. So, it’s still far too early to call this a doom scenario just yet.

But – with that being said, the stalling at highs also illustrates the danger of chasing a well-developed trend and, instead, points to the power of prudence and patience in looking for or waiting for a pullback. With today’s breakout above the 25k level, there’s even a price that can remain of interest for such, as traders can look for support potential at prior resistance, which would also offer closer proximity to recent lows for risk structuring.

Nasdaq 100 Daily Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

Importance of NVDIA

NVDIA is very much the driving force behind the AI trade an in-turn can have an impact on stocks across the space, so it is a bellwether of sorts for both AI and the broader stock market. And Jensen Huang has a history of not disappointing shareholders often using these quarterly earnings announcements to tease new products or highlight bullish news. As a matter of fact, the rally that we’re seeing today can very much be driven in anticipation of that.

But, perhaps the more interesting scenario is what happens in the event of a negative reaction to that?

As noted above it’s still too early to call this doom and gloom for bearish reversal scenarios and there’s a few different support levels in-place for the Nasdaq 100, each of which carries some attraction as we go into the earnings report later today.

The 25k level is obvious, as this is a price that’s been in-play in multiple ways since September as both resistance and support. But, below that, there was a group of swing lows around the 24,600 area which I’m looking at as an ‘s2’ spot of support. And then below that we have what I’m considering as invalidation around the 24,100 area, which was resistance in August and support in October and November.

If bulls fail to hold prices above that zone then we can begin to entertain broader bearish scenarios but, until then, there’s a case to be made on the bullish side of the index.

Nasdaq 100 Daily Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

--- written by James Stanley, Senior Market Analyst, Global Macro

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

Delayed London Stock Exchange (LSE) Data

The London Stock Exchange (LSE) market data displayed or referenced on this website is provided on a delayed basis and is not in real time. The delay period may vary but is typically at least 15 minutes. This data is intended for information purposes only and should not be relied upon for trading, investment, or other financial decisions. We do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the data for any particular purpose. Users should consult real-time data sources and obtain professional advice before making any financial decisions.

© City Index 2026