CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
News hero gradient

Nasdaq 100, S&P 500 Forecast: Bring Your Quarter to the Slaughter?

By :   Matt Simpson , Market Analyst

View related analysis:

 

S&P 500, Nasdaq quarterly charts

To be exact, we just witnessed the worst quarter for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures in 11 quarters. Their Q1 bearish candle not only snapped a 5-quarter winning streak for both indices but also formed bearish engulfing candles. Given this happened the month following a record high, I was intrigued to see how reliable this pattern could be on this timeframe.

 

Having looked through futures data for the Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500, I have manually marked either a bullish engulfing or bearish outside quarter.

 

  • There are only six prior occurrences on the Nasdaq 100, and seven on the S&P 500
  • Nasdaq 100 futures have risen 6/7 quarters, after a bearish engulfing or outside quarter has occurred
  • S&P 500 futures have risen 5/7 quarters, following a bearish outside or engulfing quarter
  • Or put another way, the Nasdaq has only declined for a second consecutive quarter on one occasion following a bearish outside or engulfing quarter, whereas the S&P 500 has fallen twice

 

From this metric alone, the odds do not appear great enough to assume another consecutive bearish quarter.

 

But if we factor in Trump’s tariffs, weaker consumer sentiment and rising inflation expectations, I don’t feel inclined to simply bet on a bullish Q2 either from these stats. Each data point has a story behind it, and context can matter.

 

 

Nasdaq 100 Technical Analysis

The weekly chart shows prices are holding just above the 2021 high, near a 38.2% Fibonacci level. The RSI (2) oversold, though no bullish divergence has formed, while the RSI (14) is confirming the bearish price action and not yet oversold. This suggests further lows, even if we need to allow for a few corrective bounces along the way.

 

Last week’s prominent bearish engulfing candle and 50-week SMA suggest resistance arounds 20,536 – 20,700, assuming any corrective bounce can make it that far. The core bias is for a move down towards the 200-week SMA, with the March 2022 high (17,436), 50% retracement level and swing lows ~18,100 potentially providing interim support levels along the way.

 

 

S&P 500 technical analysis

While I also have a bearish bias for the S&P 500, it is not as bearish as the Nasdaq 100. While both indices fell in Q1, the losses on the S&P just under half seen on the Nasdaq. Furthermore, asset managers are actively betting against the Nasdaq and have been stepping away from longs for much longer period, compared with the S&P 500 (more on that below).

 

Last week’s bearish engulfing high met resistance at the 50-week SMA and November low. A small bullish divergence has formed on the RSI (2) in the oversold zone, so perhaps this could be the better bet for Wall Street bulls over the near term. But like the Nasdaq, I will also been seeking evidence of a swing high beneath its respective bearish engulfing high in anticipation of further losses.

 

Downside targets for bears could include the 2021 high, or 5400 handle just above it. A break beneath which brings a potential support zone ~5200 into view, and the 200-week SMA or 2023 high, just above thew 5,000 handle.

 

 

S&P 500 (ES), Nasdaq 100 (NQ) futures market positioning – COT report

  • Asset managers increased net-long exposure to S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures for the first week in five last week
  • S&P 500 gross longs rose 49.7k contracts (fastest pace in 17 weeks) and shorts decreased by -202.5k contracts (fastest pace in 32 weeks)
  • But the fact that prices accelerated lower last week strongly suggest a reversal of these traders, so I suspect we’ll see net-long exposure fall in the next report
  • Looking at the bigger picture, net-long exposure to Nasdaq futures topped in February 2024, and short bets against it have been trending higher this year
  • While shot bets against the S&P 500 remain relatively low, net-long exposure topped in December

 

 

 

 

-- Written by Matt Simpson

Follow Matt on Twitter @cLeverEdge

 

How to trade with City Index

You can trade with City Index by following these four easy steps:

  1. Open an account, or log in if you’re already a customer 

    Open an account in the UK
    Open an account in Australia
    Open an account in Singapore

  2. Search for the market you want to trade in our award-winning platform 
  3. Choose your position and size, and your stop and limit levels 
  4. Place the trade

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

Delayed London Stock Exchange (LSE) Data

The London Stock Exchange (LSE) market data displayed or referenced on this website is provided on a delayed basis and is not in real time. The delay period may vary but is typically at least 15 minutes. This data is intended for information purposes only and should not be relied upon for trading, investment, or other financial decisions. We do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the data for any particular purpose. Users should consult real-time data sources and obtain professional advice before making any financial decisions.

© City Index 2026