USD/JPY Weekly Outlook: Energy in Control as Intervention Risk Lingers
- Energy driving USD/JPY, moving near lockstep with crude
- Peace talks between the US and Iran key for direction this week
- Progress tils directional risks lower, deterioration higher
- Intervention risk elevated as yen weakness and JGB yields rise together
- Economic calendar largely irrelevant
Summary
USD/JPY is being driven by energy prices, not rates, with BoJ intervention risk the only meaningful counterweight as pressure builds on Japan’s bond curve. The economic calendar is largely irrelevant in this environment, leaving direction tied to developments in oil and geopolitics. The pair finds itself consolidating near the March highs, with a slight downward bias emerging within the broader long-run uptrend.
Oil now the primary signal
The correlation matrix below reinforces the dominance of energy markets on movements not only in USD/JPY but broader markets over the past week. A 0.95 correlation with Brent is essentially lockstep, indicating Japan’s vulnerability as a major energy importer remains the dominant theme.
Source: TradingView
The reasonably tight relationship with VIX futures is also linked back to energy, with higher oil prices often driving higher volatility lately, reflecting developments in the Persian Gulf. The same is evident in the very strong inverse relationship with S&P 500 futures, the opposite relationship to what you’d expect from a funding currency for carry trades. The yen is weakening as volatility rises and risk assets wilt, not rallying as has been the historic relationship.
The same also applies for 10-year spreads between the two nations, with the strong negative correlation the polar opposite to what you’d expect in a rates-driven regime.
The overarching message is clear: energy prices are dominating. That puts developments around peace talks between Iran and the US in Pakistan, scheduled to begin this weekend, firmly in focus as the key catalyst for USD/JPY this week. Progress should see the pair move lower, while any deterioration risks another push higher.
Intervention risk is essentially the only other thing traders should be on the lookout for.
JGB curve, yen signal inflation concern
Even as sentiment towards a resolution in the Iran war improved noticeably towards the end of last week, markets continue to pressure JGBs and the yen (top right pane) simultaneously.
Source: TradingView
While the most acute weakness last week was concentrated in shorter-duration debt, indicating concerns may be shifting towards inflation rather than Japan’s economic and fiscal outlook that hammered the ultra-long end at times in March, the message is unchanged. The market is still telling policymakers that monetary policy needs to be much tighter to account for the risk of prolonged inflation, or the release valve will come through a weaker yen.
Even with April heavily favoured for a BoJ rate hike and another priced by year-end, a 1.25% overnight rate would still be deeply negative relative to the inflation outlook. You can see the pressure in the 5-year and 10-year tenors, with yields pushing to fresh highs again last week even with sharply lower energy prices.
The market is speaking and Japan’s finance minister, Satsuki Katayama, needs to listen. She was on the wires again on Friday, warning that authorities stand ready to take decisive action on “all fronts” against speculative moves across crude, oil futures and FX.
Even with the elevated threat of intervention, trying to curb yen weakness risks placing even greater upward pressure on yields than what is already being seen. If intervention comes without a shift in fundamentals, it risks looking like a band-aid solution.
Selling foreign reserves to buy yen would be far more effective in an environment where the dollar is on the back foot, so be alert to that risk if USD softens on developments in the Gulf. If intervention comes when the dollar is in demand, it risks being faded quickly.
Outside of intervention risk, as long as crude prices remain in the driving seat, it leaves the economic calendar largely redundant for anyone other than financial journalists looking for something to write about beyond the gyrations in energy markets.
Data takes a back seat
Source: TradingView
The events calendar is essentially irrelevant. If markets barely bat an eyelid to the US CPI report last Friday, it leaves the calendar this week looking meaningless for anyone seeking signal.
US PPI on Tuesday is the only release of note, offering some insight into the passthrough of higher energy and tariff rates to upstream prices. Beyond that, it’s a wall of Fed speakers, with Williams, Bowman and Waller likely to draw the most attention.
US reporting season will also get underway, with many of the big banks reporting first-quarter earnings, although history suggests these updates rarely generate major volatility for broader indices and risk appetite given the high prevalence of beats typically seen.
In Japan, BoJ Governor Ueda kicks things off on Monday in Asia, although his recent remarks have tilted towards priming the market for another hike in April. Any deviation from that view would be unusual, but given the geopolitical backdrop, it’s the environment where we should expect the unexpected.
The 20-year JGB auction also deserves passing interest given the pressure on Japanese bonds. Weak demand could add to the pressure on both JGBs and the yen.
USD/JPY consolidates near highs
Source: TradingView
USD/JPY is consolidating near multi-decade highs following the breakdown of the bullish trend that began in February, likely reflecting not only the threat posed by intervention from Japanese officials but also no further deterioration in the situation in the Gulf, at least at the time of writing.
There is a slight downward bias to the price action, as seen in the lower highs and lower lows that have printed since the latter parts of March. That’s also reflected in the oscillators, with RSI (14) and MACD trending lower, pointing to a gradual easing in upside pressure, but not yet at levels that would shift the bias towards the downside.
With the key 50, 100 and 200-day moving averages still positively sloped and the longer-running uptrend firmly in place, buying dips towards 157.52 and selling rallies towards 160 remains the preferred approach for now. 159.30 sits in between as a reference level, having acted as both support and resistance recently. It looms as a level to build trades around should we not see an opening gap on Monday.
If 157.52 were to break on the downside, it would tilt directional risks lower, bringing the 50 and 100-day moving averages into focus at 156.53, along with support ahead of 155.50. On the topside, a break and hold above the March high of 160.46 would bring 161.95 into play for those willing to push aside the threat of intervention.
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.
City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.
City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.
The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.
Delayed London Stock Exchange (LSE) Data
The London Stock Exchange (LSE) market data displayed or referenced on this website is provided on a delayed basis and is not in real time. The delay period may vary but is typically at least 15 minutes. This data is intended for information purposes only and should not be relied upon for trading, investment, or other financial decisions. We do not guarantee the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the data for any particular purpose. Users should consult real-time data sources and obtain professional advice before making any financial decisions.
© City Index 2026